<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>biblical studies &#8211; Jeff Jones Art</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jeffjonesart.com/tag/biblical-studies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jeffjonesart.com</link>
	<description>Developing art for all tastes, at all levels through a full comprehension of the clients’ needs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2016 09:30:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Bible Custom</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffjonesart.com/bible-custom/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2014 21:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical studies]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffjonesart.com/?p=1505</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ahead of as many questionings I am asking itself would not be better to call them bad behavior? III. Differences between doctrine and custom. It has for the little three basic differences between Biblical doctrine and purely human custom. The [&#8230;] <a class="more-link" href="http://www.jeffjonesart.com/bible-custom/">&#8595; Read the rest of this entry...</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahead of as many questionings I am asking itself would not be better to call them bad behavior? III. Differences between doctrine and custom. It has for the little three basic differences between Biblical doctrine and purely human custom. The Biblical doctrine leads the good customs. How much to the origin. The doctrine is divine? The custom is human How much to the reach. The doctrine is divine? The custom is local How much to the time. The doctrine is invariant? The custom is temporary the Biblical doctrine generates good customs, but good customs do not generate Biblical doctrine. </p>
<p>Churches have that they have one somatrio immense of good customs, but almost nothing of doctrine. This is very dangerous! Its members are shipwrecked with easiness for not having the ballast spiritual of the word. Conclusion I am not here for judging church that emphasizes in surplus the customs and leaves the Bible relegated in second plain, and nor I am saying on behalf of congregation none. But I have the right to disagree with this type of behavior for not having base in the word of God. It looks at the difference of the doctrine and customs and takes off your proper conclusion. to lock up I question one more time, why to be private to use and to carry through certain things you lead for them responsible for the internal regulation of the church when nor the Bible condemns for not being sin, in the truth this and for yoke weighed for the Christians, and to make it difficult more the salvation a time that the proper word speaks that and with difficulty that just if saved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Theology</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffjonesart.com/theology/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2014 03:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical studies]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffjonesart.com/?p=1245</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Study of THEOLOGY: (SUBSTANCE 02) DOCTRINE OF GOD (1 part) During all the existence of the humanity the man comes trying to understand the God. To put by means of its disclosed Word is that we can have ampler and [&#8230;] <a class="more-link" href="http://www.jeffjonesart.com/theology/">&#8595; Read the rest of this entry...</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Study of THEOLOGY: (SUBSTANCE 02) DOCTRINE OF GOD (1 part) During all the existence of the humanity the man comes trying to understand the God. To put by means of its disclosed Word is that we can have ampler and next knowledge on God. Although the nature is creation of God, for it we know that God exists is creative of all the things, but cannot know the character of God. But for the Holy script that is Its disclosed Word, we can in such a way understand the character of God as well as its intentions. We go to see below some conclusions that studious and until philosophers had defined on God. </p>
<p>It has varies definitions of God according to concepts of the men, to put many correctly are not explained by not having the Bible as the principal source of the information. Plato even so has described God with some rightnesss, did not arrive to know it as the Holy Writ teaches. The Definition of the Philosophy of Plato is accepted in part, therefore God is the author of everything, or for It everything had begins, as well as it is the way and end. I am the Alpha and the Omega, the principle and the end, first and the last one. Apocalypse 22:13 God is the Supreme mind as well as is the supreme reason, It is the cause of the efficiency of all the things: being Perpetual, invariant, onisciente, onipotente, onipresente. It has the control of everything, being just, and good It is absolute in perfection being it Proper Truth. In it is the perfect Law, being originador it of all Beauty and Order, It is the Proper one Well. ) In the Bible we can define God in the following expressions &#039; &#039; God is Esprito&#039; &#039; Jo.4: 24 and &#039; &#039; God is Light (ITm.6: 16) &#039; &#039; IJo.1: 5, these are expressions of the essential nature of God, and the expression of Its personality is &#039; &#039; God is amor&#039; &#039; (IJo.4: 7).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
